Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:29
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How the Universe and Its Mirrored Version Are Different - WIRED
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Why do Muslims not get HIV/AIDS in spite of having 4 wives and multiple relationships?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
No. 2 Coco Gauff faces No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in French Open women’s final - NBC Sports
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
New Discovery of Deep Sea 'Spiders' Is Unlike Anything We've Seen Before - ScienceAlert
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What should I do to stop being angered easily?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Logitech’s new iPad case has a compact removable wireless keyboard - The Verge
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.